Unusual News Day for Legislative Junkies
by Karl Kurtz
It's unusual when I find more than one or two stories, excluding ones on Congress, in a newspaper in one day that I mentally file in the legislative junkie category--i.e., potential fodder for The Thicket. The New York Times, which often has trouble covering its own state legislature in Albany, has five stories of interest today on legislatures in other states or countries, only one of which made it into our NCSL daily clipping service, Grasscatcher:
- A front page story on reactions to California voters' rejection of ballot proposals to implement the Legislature's budget deal and the resulting challenges facing the governor and legislative leaders. There have been lots of stories on this subject, which is why we haven't covered it in The Thicket. The angle that interested me in this story was the growing momentum for a constitutional convention in California. It would be the first in that state since 1878-79. Many seem to feel that a convention would be the best way to repair both the state's budget process and the mess of amendments that have been placed in the constitution by ballot initiatives. See also today's Los Angeles Times editorial, "California needs a constitutional convention."
- A story, "Bill to Ease Rules on Development Divides Floridians," about the Florida Legislature's action, now awaiting Gov. Charlie Crist's signature, that would make residential development easier for builders. Environmental groups that oppose the bill are urging the governor to veto it.
- "Setback to Gay Marriage in New Hampshire," which describes the Granite State House's action to reject amendments to a previously approved gay marriage bill designed to obtain Gov. John Lynch's approval. The bill will now go back to a conference committee for further efforts to reconcile differences. This is another story that has received a lot of national attention.
A news note in the international section about two members of the British House of Lords (true junkies are hooked on legislatures wherever they may be) who were suspended for taking cash to amend bills. The story notes that "the last recorded suspension of a peer was Viscount Savile [photo], who was barred by Parliament in 1642 for siding with King Charles I at the time of the English civil war." How many American legislatures can say that the last member ousted from the body was in the 19th century, much less the 17th?
- And finally, an unusual editorial, "Poor, Poor Parliament," about the sorry scandal in the British House of Commons over members' misuse of expense reimbursements. The editorial concludes with:




